A photo never lies. Or does it?
The picture shown here of Prince Charles and a servant, was seen in all major British newspapers recently.
But look closely, there are ten important signposts to something being very wrong.
These signposts are known in the intelligence community as “tells”
Before reading on see how many you can spot;
Charles has his back turned on the other man whom from his stance is obviously a servant, this physical posture has been in sequence for a while as shown by Charles' settled head, spine, and his left foot angle.
Notice both men are standing “in step” with the left, “unconscious, feminine or Sinister” foot forward, “this mirroring of posture could mean these men share many secrets going way back.
The two dogs reflect and echo this outlook, and seem very settled but bored and want “action”
In reflection of the men themselves - men are never comfortable being in close proximity to other men,
Military etiquette suggests that a nine foot circle surrounding a man, is his “watch” zone, if a man outstretches his arms, inside this span is his “killing zone” anything that comes within this range is seen as a threat, yet Charles seems quite happy, so he knows, and trusts this other man very well indeed.
Sigmund Freud saw guns as perhaps the greatest phallic symbol of all, this one is not broken as it should be, with them standing at ease, so it is obviously loaded and cocked, e.g. ready for use.
The men and dogs are at rest, but the gun is not. Why?
No one would appear happy to stand so close to someone with a gun, this man could easily be touched or hit by the stock, subconsciously this other man would be aware of the phallic interpretation, and stand either on the psychologically significant nine or six foot boundaries.
Charles. an expert shot, is carrying from the shape of his coat the cartridges in his right hand pocket,
This is wrong as they should with a right handed shooter be in the left pocket, so what does his left pocket contain ?
Criminal studies in psycho-Cheirology, have shown that those who hide their hands as both shown here, want to hide their motivations, or their shared purpose.
Mutually hidden right hands suggests their relationship is close, but some shared aspects are hidden, this hands in pockets gesture cannot be put down to cold as there is no wind, ( unruffled hair) and the men are not dressed for chilly weather.
This gesture of part of the right hand concealed in the pocket as shown, was a Masonic signal used by the Jews in Russia at the time of the Russian revolution in 1917 and has become known as a marker in the Illuminati hierarchy.
The light /shadow interaction tells that the time of day is just after midday, and the grass texture is typical of the Queens residence at Sandringham in Norfolk.
Last year the local newspapers to Sandringham reported the Queen generously gave an unnamed donation to the local Citizens Advice Bureau.
Staff at the bank photocopied this cheque from the richest woman in the world - it was for £15.
This Citizens Advice Bureau is now closed to the English people who fund it, as the huge refugee community in the area is seen as more needy.
However, the men have been standing in this position for some while, the anxious look on Charles face says he is growing impatient for some signal. His slightly open mouth suggests he has just spoken of it.
My guess here is he is expecting a signal from the “beaters” in a bird shoot, to say “get ready”.
The other man displays visual disinterest as he looks the other way but looks physically comfortable with the excessive closeness.
This other man, cannot be comfortable as his right shoulder is slightly slumped, he strangely has a heavy bag against his thigh bone, this should be at his back, this on his right thigh-bone gesture, and almost poking into Charles back again is suggestive of something phallic, whatever else this combined posture ring’s alarm bells.
Many psychologists say long exposure to single sex boarding schools can damage a mans ability to fully bond with women in later life, Charles long stay in Gordonstoun and may have ruined his marriage to Diana.
Charles is the only Royal I admire, but this picture has none of the “stiffness” that accompany photos of him with women, so he is happier in the company of men, and perhaps away from the pomp and falsity of the palace protocol.
©2006
Author T Stokes is also a lecturer and broadcaster in
paranormal studies who welcomes feedback from readers.
His email address is: palmist@fsmail.net
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
