CCCRN NEWS - Sept 18, 2002
The E-News Service of the Canadian Crop Circle Research Network
http://www.geocities.com/cropcirclecanada
_____________________________
CROP WATCH 2002
TWO NEW MAJOR MEDIA ARTICLES ON THE SCIENTIFIC
EVIDENCE FOR CROP CIRCLES
Two new substantial mainstream articles on the work of
the BLT Research
Team outlining the latest scientific evidence for a
real phenomenon, from
The Sunday Times in the UK and the Providence Journal
in the USA.
Featured are key soil studies from the 1999 Edmonton,
Alberta seven
circle barley formation. Text copies below.
THE CROP BUSTERS
The Sunday Times Magazine
September 15, 2002
Julie Cohen
and
Stuart Conway
For years, crop circles have been taken as seriously as
UFOs and
fairies. Now, not only have the weird patterns arrived
in
Hollywood, but scientists are trying to solve the
mystery. And
the answer may lie in the soil. As the helicopter
landed on the
roof of New York's Rockefeller Plaza, two uniformed
security
guards ran out, speaking into their microphone
headsets, and
rushed Nancy Talbott inside. She was ushered into a
suite where
a sumptuous buffet was laid out. Aides made a
respectful retreat
as the philanthropist Laurance S Rockefeller arrived.
Talbott,
the president of BLT Research Team Inc, an organisation
formed
to investigate physical changes in plants at crop
circles, had
been invited to lunch to discuss an exciting proposal.
Hollywood has just given British audiences its version
of what
causes crop circles, in the movie Signs, with Mel
Gibson playing
a farming preacher who discovers a formation in his
field. But
Talbott had information on the real phenomenon.
Preliminary
research suggested the circles were made by an unknown
energy.
The puzzle began six years ago for Diane Conrad, a
geologist who
analysed soil samples from a circle near her home in
Logan,
Utah. To her surprise, they displayed a characteristic
generally
found in sedimentary rock, caused by the pressure of
tons of
rock heated by the Earth's core over considerable time.
Yet
these samples were surface soil from within the crop
circle;
outside the circle, the soil showed none of these
inexplicable
traits. 'I couldn't understand the results,' Conrad
explains.
'The soil seems to have been subjected to an intense
heat of 500
to 1,500 degrees Celsius, and yet the plants were not
incinerated. They were not even singed.' What kind of
energy
could produce heat of that intensity, yet not burn the
plants to
a crisp? Conrad was unable to initiate an in-depth
evaluation at
the time, but she passed the information on to Talbott,
who has
dedicated the past 10 years to co-ordinating scientific
research
into the circles. Research of soil samples required
expensive
techniques, so her mission was to persuade Rockefeller
to fund
it.
More than 10,000 circles have been reported around the
world to
date. Formations have appeared in tree tops, ice and
sand as
well as crops. Nobody knows how many are genuine
anomalies and
how many are man-made, and scientific investigation has
been
very limited. But Conrad's work raised questions that
Talbott
believed mainstream science could not ignore. After a
convivial
lunch, Talbott handed Rockefeller her proposal. A few
weeks
later, a cheque for a 'substantial amount' arrived in
the post.
Field teams in the Netherlands, the United States and
Canada
collected soil samples. A seven-circle formation
reported in
September 1999 in Edmonton, Alberta, was chosen for
detailed
analysis. A farmer and his wife reported seeing
unexplained
lights above the field about a week before the circles
were
discovered.
Nearly 90 soil samples, as well as controls taken from
outside
the circles, were sent to Dr Sampath Iyengar, a
mineralogist in
San Diego, California. Clay minerals in the samples
were
analysed using a technique called x-ray powder
diffraction
(XRD). X-rays are beamed into the sample at various
angles, and
the way they deflect provides information about how the
atoms
are arranged, and the kind of mineral it is.
Imagine a marble represents an atom in the mineral
being
examined. If you throw a handful of them on the ground,
they
will form a random pattern. If instead you line them up
in rows,
that would indicate an 'increase in crystallinity';
something
has made them ordered, an as-yet-unexplained energy.
This is
what had happened to the surface soil from inside the
crop
circle.
Nothing like this had ever been seen in surface soil.
'This
would normally only be found in geologic sediments
exposed to
low temperatures and pressures over millions of years,'
says
Iyengar. 'In the laboratory, temperatures in the range
of 600 to
800C are usually required to achieve such crystal
growth. There
is no way we could explain these results. It's some
kind of
energy, an unknown force, that's causing this.'
Talbott, excited
by the results, needed the report peer-reviewed by an
authority.
She decided to start at the top and went to Hanover,
New
Hampshire, where she banged on the door of Dr Robert C
Reynolds
Jr of Dartmouth College. A winner of the Roebling medal
for
lifelong achievement in mineralogy, Reynolds is an
expert in x-
ray diffraction. He asked for samples to be sent to his
laboratory, and performed his own experiments. The
results were
the same.
In a letter to Talbott, he said: '... I am convinced
that the
sample preparation methods and the x-ray analytical
procedures
used were consistent with sound, standard methods of
analysis.
But this brings up the question of the meaning of their
results.
'Temperatures of 600 to 800 degrees Celsius are
required in the
laboratory for such growth and these conditions would
have
incinerated any plant material present. In short, I
believe that
our present knowledge provides no explanation...' For
the crop-
circle world, the involvement of such a distinguished
expert in
the subject is a great victory. It is the first time a
scientist
of his standing has taken an interest in the
phenomenon. Where
does the intense heat come from? Some witnesses claim
to have
seen small balls of light and heard trilling noises in
the
fields just before a circle has appeared, but whether
this is
related has yet to be proven. 'It is possible we are
observing
the effects of a new or as yet unrecognised energy
source,' says
Talbott in the BLT report.
One of the biggest contributions to the scientific
study of crop
circles has come from the Michigan biophysicist W C
Levengood,
who began investigating plants taken from circles in
1990. The
most curious anomalies he has studied are pinhead-sized
holes in
plant nodes, the fibrous 'knuckle-like' protuberances
found
along the stem. He calls these holes 'expulsion
cavities'.
Levengood believes moisture inside the stems is heated
rapidly
and turns to steam, in some places stretching the plant
fibre,
and in others blowing a hole in the stem. 'It seems to
be a
powerful microwave energy that is causing this; it
heats from
the inside out. The interesting thing is, these holes
occur in a
matter of microseconds.'
The youngest, and most elastic, tissue in the plant
stems is at
the top, and it is here that he has consistently
observed
elongated nodes - stretched sometimes to double their
normal
length. Lower down, where the tissue is more fibrous
and less
elastic, expulsion cavities are regularly seen. These
effects
have never been found in control samples. Levengood
also found
changes to the seeds and germination capability of
plants within
the circles. When circles occur in mature plants with
fully
formed seeds, the seeds often grow up to five times
faster than
control seeds, and the seedlings can tolerate lack of
water and
light for a considerable time without apparent harm.
While investigating the crop-circle seeds at his
Pinelandia
Biophysical Laboratory in Grass Lake, Michigan,
Levengood
discovered a way of using a process he calls molecular
impulse
response (MIR). 'When I exposed the seeds to the MIR
energy, I
got the same effect as in the crop formation. We can
produce
seeds that grow a lot faster.' Along with his colleague
John
Burke, he patented the formula in 1998. Is the
agricultural
industry interested? 'Oh yes. We hope the grain will be
ready
next year. There are several companies doing big field
trials at
the moment.'
This summer, field researchers found expulsion cavities
inside a
formation resembling a celtic knot in Avebury Trusloe,
Wiltshire. The formation, reported on June 2 in a
barley field,
was examined by the former government scientist Rodney
Ashby,
who began investigating crop circles six years ago.
'The
stretched nodes and expulsion cavities in this
formation are
very interesting,' he says. 'This occurred only on the
stems
that were flattened to create the formation.
I always look for the most logical explanation, but in
cases
like this there just doesn't seem to be one.'
From the edge of the field in the waist-high barley, it
is
impossible to see the downed crop. The only
extraordinary
features seem to be the ancient Adam and Eve stones in
the next
field. Scholars believe they marked the beginning of an
avenue
of stones leading to the stone circle around Avebury. A
few
hundred yards inside the field, the crop suddenly
flattens in
swirling patterns.
Daniel Lobb, a field researcher, picks up a handful of
barley
stalks. Sure enough, there are tiny holes and stretched
nodes
that are double the length of the plants outside the
circle.
Next morning at the Silent Circle, a cafe in Cherhill,
the hub
of crop-circle information, 15 people are watching a
video of
the latest circle. A map on the wall covered with pins
is
quickly updated with the position of the most recent
formation.
The cafe walls are covered with aerial photographs of
the 70
circles reported so far in the UK this year, and
posters by the
former architect and professor of design Michael
Glickman, who
draws the geometry of the formations.
'Let's go,' cries Glickman. It's like a call to the
hunt, and
everyone piles into their cars. In the lead is
Glickman,
followed by the Croatian documentary maker Nikola
Duper, then
three Italian women, a Dutch couple who have come to
Wiltshire
for the past 10 years to see the circles, and us. The
convoy
snakes along narrow roads past thatched cottages in
tiny
villages. Everyone is waving and chatting excitedly on
their
mobiles about what the shape could be. As we pull up by
the
field, we see people on stepladders holding cameras
attached to
long poles, trying to get an aerial shot. A helicopter
circles
overhead and the 'croppies', as they are known, pull
out cameras
and notebooks.
Next day, when the aerial pictures are put up in the
cafe, there
is concern that it may be man-made. 'We're under
attack,' says
Glickman as he sips his coffee dejectedly. 'It's a
waste of
researchers' time and money to be polluting the fields
with
these second-rate man-made circles when there's a real
phenomenon needing more studies.'
Interest in the circles has intensified this year.
Signs opened
in the US on August 2 and took more than $60m in its
first three
days, sending it straight to No 1 at the US box office.
The
British drama A Place to Stay, set in the crop circles
of
Wiltshire, also looks set to pique public interest.
Freddy Silva, the British author of the recent book
Secrets in
the Fields, which sold 10,000 copies in the US in its
first
week, is looking over a formation at the Gallops, near
Beckhampton, an impressive shape with 76 radiating
spokes. A
deer leaps to the centre and stays for a few moments
before
running out. 'Whatever Hollywood comes up with about
the
theories behind the crop circles, it will never be as
intriguing
and mysterious as the real thing,' says Silva.
LESLIE KEAN: ORIGIN OF CROP CIRCLES BAFFLES SCIENTISTS
09/16/2002
SAN FRANCISCO
SINCE THE RECENT release of the movie Signs, crop
circles have been
thrust into the limelight. Such major publications as
Scientific
American and U.S. News and World Report have echoed the
common belief
that all crop circles are made by stealthy humans
flattening plants with
boards. This assumption would be fair enough if we had
no information
suggesting otherwise.
However, intriguing data published in peer-reviewed
scientific journals
clearly establishes that some of these geometric
designs, found in
dozens of countries, are not made by "pranks with
planks." In fact, a
study about to be published by a team of scientists and
funded by
Laurance Rockefeller concludes "it is possible that we
are observing the
effects of a new or as yet undiscovered energy source."
In the early 1990s, biophysicist William C. Levengood,
of the Pinelandia
Biophysical Laboratory, in Michigan, examined plants
and soils from 250
crop formations, randomly selected from seven
countries. Samples and
controls were provided by the Massachusetts-based BLT
Research Team,
directed by Nancy Talbott.
Levengood, who has published over 50 papers in
scientific journals,
documented numerous changes in the plants from the
formations. Most
dramatic were grossly elongated plant nodes (the
"knuckles" along the
stem) and "expulsion cavities" -- holes literally blown
open at the
nodes -- caused by the heating of internal moisture
from exposure to
intense bursts of radiation. The steam inside the stems
escaped by
either stretching the nodes or, in less elastic tissue,
exploding out
like a potato bursting open in a microwave oven.
Seeds taken from the plants and germinated in the lab
showed significant
alterations in growth, as compared with controls.
Effects varied from an
inability to develop seeds to a massive increase in
growth rate --
depending on the species, the age of the plants when
the circle was
created and the intensity of the energy system involved.
These anomalies were also found in tufts of standing
plants inside crop
circles -- clearly not a result of mechanical
flattening -- and in
patches of randomly downed crops found near the
geometric designs. These
facts suggested some kind of natural, but unknown,
force at work.
Published in Physiologia Plantarum (1994), the
international journal of
the European Societies of Plant Physiology, Levengood's
data showed that
"plants from crop circles display anatomical
alterations which cannot be
explained by assuming the formations are hoaxes." He
defined a "genuine"
formation as one "produced by external energy forces
independent of
human influence."
A strange brown "glaze" covering plants within a
British formation was
the subject of Levengood and John A. Burke's 1995 paper
in the Journal
of Scientific Exploration. The material was a pure iron
that had been
embedded in the plants while the iron was still molten.
Tiny iron
spheres were also found in the soil.
In 1999, British investigator Ronald Ashby examined the
glaze through
optical and scanning electron microscopes. He
determined that intense
heat had been involved -- iron melts at about 2,700
degrees Fahrenheit
-- administered in millisecond bursts. "After
exhaustive inquiry, there
is no mundane explanation for the glaze" he concluded.
In another paper for Physiologia Plantarum (1999),
Levengood and Talbott
suggested that the energy causing crop circles could be
an atmospheric
plasma vortex -- multiple interacting electrified air
masses that emit
microwaves as they spiral around the earth's
magnetic-field lines.
Some formations, however, contain cubes and straight
lines.
Astrophysicist Bernard Haisch, of the California
Institute for Physics
and Astrophysics, says that such "highly organized,
intelligent patterns
are not something that could be created by a force of
nature."
But Haisch points out that since not all formations are
tested, it is
unknown how many are genuine. Nor is it likely that
such complex designs
could evolve so quickly in nature. "Natural phenomena
make mountain
ranges and form continents -- they don't learn geometry
in ten years,"
says Haisch, who is the science editor for the
Astrophysical Journal.
In 1999, philanthropist Laurance Rockefeller made
possible the most
definitive -- and most revealing -- study to date. The
BLT Research Team
collected hundreds of plant and soil samples from a
seven-circle barley
formation in Edmonton, Canada. The plants had both
elongated nodes and
expulsion cavities, and the soils contained the
peculiar iron spheres,
indicating a genuine formation. The controls showed
none of these changes.
Mineralogist Sampath Iyengar, of the Technology of
Materials Laboratory,
in California, examined specific heat-sensitive clay
minerals in these
soils, using X-ray diffraction and a scanning electron
microscope. He
discovered an increase in the degree of crystallinity
(the ordering of
atoms) in the circle minerals, which statistician Ravi
Raghavan
determined was statistically significant at the 95
percent level of
confidence.
"I was shocked," says Iyengar, a 30-year specialist in
clay mineralogy.
"These changes are normally found in sediments buried
for thousands and
thousands of years under rocks, affected by heat and
pressure, and not
in surface soils."
Also astounding was the direct correlation between the
node-length
increases in the plants and the increased
crystallization in the soil
minerals -- indicating a common energy source for both
effects. Yet the
scientists could not explain how this would be
possible. The temperature
required to alter soil crystallinity would be between
1,500 and 1,800
degrees F. This would destroy the plants.
Understanding the possible ramifications of these
findings, Talbott
sought the expertise of an emeritus professor of
geology and mineralogy
at Dartmouth College, Robert C. Reynolds Jr., who is
former president of
the Clay Minerals Society. He is regarded by his
colleagues as the
"best-known expert in the world" on X-ray diffraction
analysis of clay
minerals.
Reynolds determined that the BLT Team's data had been
"obtained by
competent personnel, using current equipment."
The intense heat required for the observed changes in
crystallinity
"would have incinerated any plant material present," he
confirms in a
statement for the Rockefeller report. "In short, I
believe that our
present knowledge provides no explanation."
Meteorologist James W.
Deardorff, professor emeritus at the College of Oceanic
and Atmospheric
Sciences at Oregon State University, and previously a
senior scientist
at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, states
in a 2001
Physiologia Plantarum commentary that the variety,
complexity and
artistry of crop circles "represent the work of
intelligence," and not a
plasma vortex. "That is why the hoax hypothesis has
been popularly
advocated," he says.
However, he points out, the anomalous properties in
plant stems
thoroughly documented by Levengood and Talbott could
not possibly have
been implemented by hoaxers. Deardorff describes one
1986 British
formation in which upper and lower layers of crop were
intricately
swirled and bent perpendicular to each other, in a
fashion that "defies
any explanation."
"People don't want to face up to this, and scientists
have to deal with
the ridicule factor," he said in a recent interview.
Adding to the puzzle, professional filmmakers have
documented bizarre
daytime "balls of light" at crop-circle sites. Light
phenomena were
observed by multiple witnesses at the site of the
Canadian circle so
meticulously examined under the Rockefeller grant.
Eltjo Hasselhoff, a Dutch experimental physicist, has
taken on the study
of what he describes as "bright, fluorescent flying
light objects,sized
somewhere between an egg and a football."
Scientists face real and serious questions in
confronting this mystery.
Could this be secret laser technology beamed down from
satellites? Is it
a natural phenomenon? Is there a consciousness or
intelligence directing
an energy form yet unknown to us?
"To look at the evidence and go away unconvinced is one
thing," says
astrophysicist Haisch. "To not look at the evidence and
be convinced
against it . . . is another. That is not science." It's
not good
journalism, either.
Leslie Kean is an investigative reporter and producer
with Pacifica
Radio based in the San Francisco Bay Area. She can be
reached at
lkean@ix.netcom.net
____________________________
CCCRN News is the e-news service of the Canadian Crop
Circle
Research Network, providing e-mail updates with the
latest news
and reports on the crop circle phenomenon in Canada, as
well as
other information on CCCRN-related projects and events,
sent free
to your e-mail.
To subscribe, send an e-mail with Subscribe CCCRN News
in the subject line to:
psa@look.ca
The Canadian Crop Circle Research Network is a
non-profit
research organization which has been investigating and
documenting the crop circle phenomenon and other
possibly
related phenomena in Canada since 1995, creating a
liason
between researchers, farmers, the public, the media and
scientists in trying to solve this ongoing enigma.
Main Office
202 - 325 East 14th Avenue
Vancouver, BC V5T 2M9 Canada
Tel / Fax: 604.731.8522
Cell: 604.727.1454
E-Mail: psa@look.ca
Web: www.geocities.com/cropcirclecanada
© Canadian Crop Circle Research Network, 2002
|