|
SPACE DIMENSIONS :. |
|
|
| |
THE ARTIFICIAL WORLD WE LIVE IN |
|
Posted Jan 06.05

The Universe is unreal. Life is unreal. Nature
is not natural.
[The articles mentioned in this article can either be
found on this site
or by placing doug yurchey in Google. Comments and
questions are welcome
at dugko@surfside.net - The purpose here is to link
these ideas into an
overall viewpoint or theme].
Do we really live in The
Matrix?
Part One
We assume the world is natural; that everything
just happens,
naturally. Schoolbooks teach us that the entire
Universe just BANGED into
existence. Scientists assume that stars and planets
came into being by
dust and debris coalescing or concentrating over eons
of time. Educators
tell us that Life came into being on Earth through
natural forces. They
say: We humans are simply natural by-products of the
world around us. We
crawled out of the oceans; we evolved into primates; we
stood erect and
developed into modern creatures over extremely long
periods of time...so
say the evolutionists.
That was not the case. Funny, how wrong the
universities are in
their studies of anthropology! The most important
question of how Life
began on Earth cannot be answered through traditional
means. There are
too many holes in the story of Evolution. If we came
from monkies,
monkies would only be found in the fossil record and
would not be alive.
Not only are there human missing links, but also
there are missing
links in every single species of every single known
life form. On this
subject, there was an old Phil Donahue Show that
concerned
'Evolutionists Against Darwinism.' They rolled out a
very long
scroll or genealogy chart that contained all species
and their
permutations. The chart was virtually blank. There
were only a few
animals with links to other forms. We know, for
certain, of only a few
changes over time. There was not one complete animal
chain of forms from
the earliest times to modern times.
Brain size of ancient Cro-Magnons was LARGER than
the brain size of
modern humans! This anthropological truth is ignored
by traditional
sources because it is not understood by traditional
sources.
Cro-Mags were not primitive in any way. Revered
psychic Edgar
Cayce understood that the Cro-Magnons were the
Atlanteans. The
Incan and Egyptian surviving Cro-Mags were the
Atlantean elite; our
ancestors. They were the pyramid-builders and ancient
astronauts. The
evidence shows a degeneration, over eons, down to
modern humans. A
smooth, upward, human Progression is not what history
records.
We assume the educators know what they are talking
about. We assume
the anthropologists are correct because 'that's their
job and they're the
experts.' We should question traditional conclusions.
We should realize
that scientists, in general, believe what they do for
one
main reason: They want to differ from and oppose
Religion. Readers can
examine my article called 'My Atlantis' which puts
forth another
alternative to these traditions.
You have heard of 'star-stuff.' We are
star-stuff. The same
molecules in us are also found inside stars. This,
again, is a big
misconception. The real motive for such a philosophy
is to eliminate the
idea that an INTELLIGENCE was behind our genesis. They
want you to
believe that everything is natural. Nothing is farther
from the truth.
This writer is not saying 'God did it.' God is an
overwhelming, inconceivable concept that no one should talk about
since no one can
understand it.
We ARE products of intelligent beings in the
Universe. Another
article that one might consider is called 'The Purpose
for the Human
Race.' We are strangers on Earth. Our ancestors
landed here and
made this planet their home. We are also not the
creations of
aliens. Aliens did not accelerate the development of
natural,
Earthly primates. We came from HUMANS. These
prehistoric, human
ancestors are not the ones you are familiar with. They
(we) were
once spiritual, super-tech GODS. But, we have fallen
from greatness.
The point here is to state that the Universe is
not just gas and dust
and debris. It is not outrageous to believe that the
cosmos is
filled with Life. What if the Universe itself is an
artificial
construct? Where scientists see only lifelessness;
there could be life.
What we believe is natural, could be artificial. Out of
ignorance, we may be viewing the Universe the wrong
way. Maybe the truth
is: The world is unnatural. It was all MADE or
manufactured by
intelligences far beyond our comprehension.
Let's examine celestial objects in our own Solar
System. We do not
have to look far in our search for cosmic
artificialness. The Moon might
not be natural. It is too large. The only other
planets with similar
sized moons are the GIANT planets of Jupiter and
Saturn. Great Saturn
only has one satellite close to the size of our Moon
(Titan). Venus is
similar to the size of Earth and is moonless. Mars has
only two small
meteors as moons.
The Moon contains rocks older than any bodies in
our Solar System.
The Moon does not fit with the rest of the planets and
satellites. Could
the Moon have been BROUGHT IN?
In an exclusive interview, Jordan Maxwell 'the
Godfather of Secret
Societies' revealed that he attended a Moon/Mars
Conference in
Oakland, CA. Richard Hoagland of NASA and
writer/lecturer of the
Monuments of Mars spoke at this 1995 conference. Lunar
and Martian
anomalies were discussed. The government classified a
million lunar
photographs and restricted their distribution to the
public.
Government sources MAY confirm that THE MOON IS HOLLOW.
Our satellite is
composed of a 'metallic superstructure.' It was
brought into the Solar
System.
In an article called 'Who Stops to Question the
Man in the Moon?'
readers find that the Man in the Moon might be an
artificial
situation. We think it is natural for the Moon to
always have one side
that faces the Earth. We all take this astronomical
fact for granted.
Not only did someone; some high intelligence bring the
Moon in...but it
was PURPOSELY SET to rotate precisely as it revolved
around Earth. This
is a synchronized clockwork condition that will never
change. It should
change. Orbits decay and change over time. Either a
slowing or speeding
up of rotation and revolution would alter the perfect
'in sync'
relationship we have with our Moon. Scientists know
this will never
change. The far side of the Moon will always face away
from our planet.
Normally and naturally: We should, intermittently, see
the lunar far
side. But we never will and this is NOT NATURAL!
Could an ancient machine or device be purposely
compensating the
lunar rotation and revolution to keep this unnatural
planet/moon
system going as is? Why would someone want one side of
the Moon to face
the Earth? The reason is the only planet that we know
for sure has LIFE
also has the perfect observation platform. From the
far side; aliens,
humans-with-the-technology or any higher intelligent
ETs could operate
secretly. Radio-silence of the Moon would block all
broadcasts. It is
logical to assume that SOMEBODY uses the lunar far
side. It is the
perfect place for an observation base. It is too
perfect. Our monitors
from the Moon could be numerous alien races and the
Feds, working in
secret.
Scientists say we are 'gravity-locked' with our
Moon. Gravity-Lock
is a myth. Astronomers had to come up with some
natural explanation, no
matter how unfounded. If G.L. exists, why aren't all
planets
gravity-locked with their moons? Why are we different?
The
astrophysicists cannot answer these basic questions;
yet we are to believe
their NATURAL answers. The Moon, in every way, is an
anomally.
Luna has artificial structures. The Feds are
operating, in secret, on the
Moon and even on the planet Mars. We have not returned
to the Moon
because we are covertly there. Please read the article
'Secret Bases on
the Moon and Mars.' There have been reports that the
Moon has slight
weather. Question the party line of a lifeless Moon
and Mars. What THEY
tell us on the media might not be the truth.
Another synchronic relationship between planet and
moon also exists
with Pluto/Charon. Charon orbits 'in sync' with the
ROTATION of
Pluto. This is a different situation than our satellite
relationship. On the surface of Pluto, Charon would
never move and always
be in the same position in the sky. Pluto's and Earth's
synchronicity are not the norm for celestial bodies.
There are
probably more than 100 satellites to all the planets in
our Solar
System. These two situations are known oddities in the
great
minority. What makes these oddities different than the
rest of the
satellites? Maybe the systems only seem natural and
are really
artificial situations? Could cosmic INTELLIGENCES have
artificially
created what we assume is natural?
Mars once had Earthlike conditions. There was
water. Huge canyons
were carved by water that flowed on the Martian
surface. There are dried
up riverbeds. The red planet's atmosphere was much
thicker long, long
ago. At Cydonia, there is an ALIGNED Great Pyramid.
The Pyramid is not a
natural formation caused by a trick of light. The
Cydonia Great Pyramid
has been estimated to be approximately a mile long and
a million years
old! Ancient, Earthly pyramids only acquire energy and
power if they are
aligned with the directions. This fact, along with
many similarities
between Giza and Cydonia, has convinced Richard
Hoagland of pyramids on
Mars. More researchers should be open to the idea that
human life once
existed on Mars. THERE IS A FACE next to the Great
Pyramid at Cydonia.
Next to Earth's Great Pyramid, there is a Sphinx; a
large face. On Mars,
the carved FACE is located near the Martian Great
Pyramid. Were ancient
Martians gods of war?
The concept of HUMAN features constructed in stone
on Mars, breaks
all the evolutionary laws that say the human race is
unique; a
product of unique circumstances only found on Earth.
If we evolved on
Earth exclusively, then we should not discover humans
on other
prehistoric planets. Darwin was wrong! Darwinism is
truly NOT based on
science. It is based on inaccurate assumptions. It is
more likely that
humans were seeded on Earth as a result of
intelligences from space than
ever crawled out of our oceans. Are governments
publicly skeptical of the
Cydonia Monuments because they have already studied the
ruins in secret?
Why have our 'public' NASA programs failed to explore
these long known
MARTIAN anomalies? Curious.
Many Martian probes have previously malfunctioned
and have been lost.
These were not accidents or normal failures. The
probes were made to fail
so we do not discover a military presence already on
Mars!
The 5th planet is not Jupiter. Jupiter is
actually the 6th planet.
The 5th planet was BLOWN UP! We know the Solar System
is composed of
inner planets, outer planets and a gap between them.
Within the gap,
astronomers discovered the Asteroid Belt. This was
once a planet.
Another article to read is 'Bode's Law and KBOs.'
There is a simple
formula to find the distances of the planets out from
the sun. It is
called Bode's Law. The formula was considered a valid
rule up to the late
19th Century. The Asteroid Belt was discovered while
astronomers searched
for the missing planet in the gap. They originally
thought they found it
with the discovery of Ceres; the largest asteroid.
Then they found Vesta;
the next largest, shattered fragment. These are pieces
of a pulverized
planet.
Slowly, astronomers observed and recorded thousands or
irregular fragments
orbitting at the 2.8 Astronomical Unit distance. Mars
is at 1.6 AUs and
Jupiter is at 5.2 AUs. The asteroids are rarely found
outside of Mars and
Jupiter. Certainly, some meteors do fly away from that
area and pass by
Earth. Shooting stars are these fragments from a
(possibly once
life-filled) planet that enter our atmosphere. Comets
also account for
our meteor showers.
Could the early Martians [a planet of war] have
gone to war with the
planet that became the Asteroid Belt? Did the Martians
blow it up? Is
what we found in the gap, the aftermath of a great war
of the
planets? The point here is: What we take for granted
as
natural...might not be. Prehistoric space wars or acts
of alien
armies could have left the Solar System in its present
state. God might
not be involved. The gods are another story.
The planet Venus is not natural. At .72
Astronomical Units, Venus is
a total enigma. It's extremely thick atmosphere acts
as a
pressure-cooker. There is a big mystery here: How is
Venus losing its
energy? The planet captures its heat energy and does
not release it into
space. Scientists expected a molten planet. When
probes finally peeked
through the thick atmosphere, they found THE MOST
INTENSE CRATERING IN
THE SOLAR SYSTEM! This means that the surface of Venus
is so super
ancient and dense that we have preserved craters from
the days of the
early Solar System. Venus has not terra-formed or
changed in all that
time. No one expected high mountain peaks on Venus.
Another article to
read is called 'Life Inside Venus?' The article
indicates that the second
planet from the sun is not a natural object. Venus
functions more like an
artificial orb; something constructed; like George
Lucas' Deathstar; than
a normal planet. There are hellish conditions on the
surface of Venus.
INSIDE Venus might be the perfect place to hide an
advanced civilization.
Is this theorized race of Venusians using up the
planet's heat energy on
the inside?
Returning to Bode's Law, all the planets conform
to a particular
pattern out from the sun. Some intelligence put the
planets in their
place. If the positioning of planets were a natural or
RANDOM event, the
planets would have chaotic orbits around the sun.
Instead, there is
virtually perfect ORDER: The planets' orbits are
aligned ellipses in an
Ecliptic Plane. Neptune is an exception. When Neptune
was discovered in
the late 19th Century, Bode's Law was discarded. The
next planet beyond
Neptune, PLUTO, fits the Bode formula. When Pluto was
found in 1930,
Bode's Law should have been reconsidered. But, no one
has noticed this
astronomical fact. In the article 'Bode's Law and
KBOs' this writer
predicted that the next planet beyond Pluto would orbit
at 77.2 AUs from
the sun. That distance is 77.2 X 93 million miles.
The article was first
posted on the Farshores website in October 20, 2002.
Years later, SEDNA
was found to be approximately 77 AUs from the sun. The
new planet has
been discovered and further indicates the great order
in the Solar System.
The positioning of Sedna tends it to be a true planet;
different than
other Kuiper Belt objects. The prediction coming true
was announced in an
article called 'I Predicted the Distance to the New
Planet.' Some higher
intelligence placed the planets in perfect order;
originally. Over
billions of years of cosmic change, the perfect
positioning has slightly
altered. For example, Saturn fits Bode's Law; but is
slightly off. The
formation of its huge ring system could have slightly
shifted the planet
from its Bode's position.
If we take Bode's Law out to its next position,
the answer is 154
AUs. In these very dark regions of the far Solar
System, astronomers
might discover another planet at the next B.L. distance
of 154 AUs. This
could surprise everyone by being a GIANT planet and not
be Pluto-sized.
There could be life forms out there so advanced
that they are
planet-makers. They could build planets and
planetoids. Other ETs could
be in charge of maintaining whole galaxies. And others
could be in charge
of clusters of galaxies. There are no limits to the
Universe or what Life
is capable of building.
Comets are incoming material from the outer
reaches of the Solar
System. They do not have planetary orbits. They have
extreme
cigar-shaped orbits. Comets speed into the center of
the Solar System,
accelerate around the sun and warp back out to the cold
Kuiper Belt.
Something forced this cometary material into their
extreme orbits. A
great explosion is a likely cause for the creation of a
comet. What if
comets are remnants of blown up worlds? These cosmic
explosions might not
be natural, but purposeful acts of violence by advanced
intelligences.
Did a FAR outer planet explode and create what we call
comets? By the
same token, supernovas also might not be natural events.
An astrophysicist looks at a galaxy containing
many Black Holes and
still sees only lifelessness. Yet, inward Black Holes
and outward Quasar
White Holes could really be extraterrestrial transit
systems! Other life
forms might use the curves of space and wormholes as a
means of travel.
In another article called 'Light-Speed Universes,'
an amazing thought
is put forth: The Electro-Magnetic Spectrum is not
just a series of
lifeless wavelengths (energy). Other universes,
composed of real
atoms, are passing by us and through us at light-speed.
They appear as
different wavelengths to us. EM waves are truly
bombarding us in all
directions. Radio telescopes prove this fact. Only
light is visible. At
different frequencies are ultraviolet; infrared;
x-rays; microwaves;
short-waves; long radio waves; television; cosmic rays,
etc.
How can something act as particle and wave? The
answer is relative
movement. Move a 'quanta,' atom or dot extremely
fast...and you have a
line, a curved arc or a particular wavelength. A
physical tree is only a
tree because it moves as you move and appears physical.
If the tree moved
by you at light-speed, it would be photon-energy moving
like a wavelength
or light beam. Because of relativity, other universes
whip by us at
light-speed. We can only discern these real worlds as
EM wavelengths.
Also, our entire (seemingly stationary) universe is
only a wavelength TO
THEM. To that other world passing by us, their radio
telescopes could
only perceive our entire universe as a radio wave! The
physical universe
is similar to
television signals. We are all television
transmissions traveling through
space. Universes are endless. Endless worlds, each
with their own Big
Bang, fly through space at relative frequencies. A
saucer flying at warp
speed would catch up with one of these worlds and it
would seem
stationary.
Is every star what it appears to be? A few
stellar objects could
have other purposes to other creatures. They could
primarily be
life-giving, nuclear orbs of ignited gases. Suns could
also have
been purposely placed there to see what life will
thrive in the Petri
dish. We could all be an experiment in a gigantic,
astronomical test
tube. Are we all in an unreal Truman Show?
Life does not just happen. If you had an empty
fish tank with all
the elements for life... You would have a very, very
long wait for life
to emerge. In fact, it would NEVER just emerge on its
own. Life does not
just come to be on its own on a planet. Something does
not just form or
evolve out of a vacuum of Nothing. Life has to be
seeded. Once you put
guppies, plants and food in the fish tank...life will
exist. If those
positive conditions are maintained, the life will
flourish. Basic Darwin
Evolution has been proven to be incorrect. The
evidence suggests that
humans and animals appeared on Earth in a relatively
short time. BANG!
Poof, there was carbon-based life on Earth. Plants and
animals did not
come to be from a very long period of change and
evolution.
If some of the articles mentioned here were read,
you would find this
writer believes we came from HUMAN supermen and
superwomen; advanced-tech
Atlanteans. This means that God did not create Life on
Earth. Evolution
did not 'create' humans, animals and plants on Earth.
Our human, ancient
ancestors (not aliens) genetically created all the
animals and all the
plants. Life, itself, on this planet was not a natural
thing. We were
MADE; genetically planned, built and constructed.
Probably, our human
seeders also traveled to other planets. This could
explain a giant, human
face and structures on Mars.
>> Part Two
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  |

All Copyrights © are acknowledged.
Material reproduced here is for educational and research purposes only.